Determination of the Effects of Adding Different Additives to Forage Plant Mixture Silage on In Vitro Fermentation Parameters and Feed Quality
Abstract views: 262 / PDF downloads: 43
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13207444Keywords:
Silage of Forage Mixture, Molasses, Carob, Gladica, Feed QualityAbstract
This study was conducted to determine the effect of different additives (molasses, carob and gladicia) on in vitro fermentation parameters, feed value, feed quality and by using in vitro gas production technique and Ankom Daisy in vitro fermentation system by adding different additives to feed plant mixture silage at a determined rate (4.5%). A total of 4 trial groups were formed by adding 3 different treatment groups (4.5% molasses, 4.5% carob fracture, 4.5% gladicia), one of which was the control group, to the mixed silage of the feed plant. The prepared silage samples were vacuumed in vacuum bags (25x35cm) in 3 repetitions in a kitchen-type vacuum machine and stored at 25 ± 2 ºC for 60 days. With the addition of different additives to the mixed silage; pH, NH3, FP (fleig score), CO (crude oil), NDF, ADF, ADL, GP (gas production), Methane, %Methane, TDDM (true digestible dry matter), TDD (true digestibility degree), ME (metabolic energy), NEL (net energy lactation), OMD (organic matter digestion), DMD (dry matter digestibility), NYD (relative feed value) and RFQ (relative feed quality) were found to be significantly affected by treatment (P< 0.05).
As a result, it has been found that by contributing to the relative feed value and quality of feed plant mixture silage treatment, increasing energy content, organic matter digestion, total digestible nutrition, dry matter intake and the actual degree of digestion; it improves the quality of the ration.
References
Akbag, H.I. & Yurtman I.Y. (2022). Effect of concrete and poyethylene glycol supplementation on in vitro gas production characteristisc of some shrub species. COMU J. Agric. Fac., 10, 1-15.
Al-Baadani H.H.; Alowaimer A.N., Al-Badwi M.A., Abdelrahman M.M., Soufan W.H. & Alhidary I.A. (2022). Evaluation of the nutritive value and digestibility of sprouted barley as feed for growing lambs: in vivo and in vitro studies. Animal, 12, 1206. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ani12091206.
Anonim, (1987). Bewertung Von Grünfutter, Silage Und Heu. Dlg-Merkblatt, No. 224. Dlg-Verlag, Frankfurt/M.
AOAC, (1998). Officinal Methods of Analysis. 16th ed., AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Anonim, (1993). Bestimmung des pH-Wertes. In: Die chemischen Untersuchungen von Futtermitteln. Teil 18 Silage. Abschnit 18.1 Bestimmung des pH-Wertes. Methodenbuch Bd. III., VDLUFAV Verlag, Darmstadt.
Atalay, A.İ. (2015). The use of locust bean fracture as a silage additive forgrass. PhD. Thesis, University of Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Animal Science. K. Maraş, Turkey.
Atalay, A.İ. & Kamalak, A. (2018). Effect of locust bean fracture on in vitro and in situ degradation of grass silage. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 8, 361-367.
Ayasan, T. & Karakozak, E. (2012). Effects of use of ınoculant in silages composed of different forage crops on crude nutrient content and quality. Fırat University Health Sciences Veterinary Journal, 26, 93-98.
Ayasan, T.; Sucu E., Ülger, İ., Hizli, H., Cubukcu, P. & Ozcan, B.D. (2020). Determination of in vitro rumen digestibility and potential feed value of tiger nut varieties. South African Journal of Animal Science, 50, 738-744.
Blümmel, M.; Steingass, H. & Becker, K. (1997). The relationship between in vitro gas production, in vitro microbial biomass yield and Nile15 incorporation and its implications for the prediction of voluntary fodder intake of roughages. Brit J Nutr, 77, 911-921.
Canbolat, O.; Kalkan, H. & Filya İ. (2013). The use of honey locust pods as a silage additive for alfalfa forage. Journal of Kafkas University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 19, 291-297.
Canbolat, O.; Akbay, K.C. & Kamalak, A. (2019). Possibilities of use of molasses as carbohydrate source in pea silages. KSU J. Agric Nat., 22, 122-130.
Christodouloua,V.; Bampidisa, V.A., Hucko, B., Ploumi, K., Iliadis, C., Robinson, P.H. & Müdrik Z. (2005). Nutritional value of chickpeas in rations of lactating ewes and growing lambs. Animal Feed Sci. Technol., 118: 229-241.
Demirbas, H. & Cetinkaya N. (2020). Determination of chemical composition, in-vitro digestibility, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of carob pulp. Manas Journal of Agriculture Veterinary and Life Sciences, 10, 103-109.
Dixon, R.M. & Hosking, B.J. (1992). Nutritional value of grain legumes for ruminants Nutrition Research Reviews. 5:19-43.
Goel, G.; Makkar, H.P.S. & Becker K. (2008). Effect of sesbania sesban and carduus pycnocephalus leaves and fenugreek (Trigonella foenumilegraecum L) seeds and their extract on partitioning of nutrients from roughageileand concentrateilebased feeds to methane. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 147, 72-89.
Guven, İ. & Kamalak, A. (2021). The use of honey locust pods as a silage additive for grass. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 4, 22-28. doi: 10.34248/bsengineering.836056
Gursoy, E.; Sezmis, G. & Kaya A. (2022). Determination of the effects of fertilizer applications at different levels on feed value, feed quality and in vitro fermentation parameters of forage crops mixture harvested at different periods. OKU Journal of The Institute of Science and Technology, 5, 243-257.
Kamalak, A.; Özoğul, F., Çalışlar, S., & Canbolat, O. (2012). Silaj katkı maddesi olarak yemlik keçiboynuzu kırığının yonca silajının kompozisyonuna, koyunlarda yem tüketimine, sindirim derecesine ve rumen fermantasyonuna etkisi. Tubitak Proje Raporu. No.110 O 397, s.1: 74.
Kılıç, A. (1986). Silo Yemi (Öğretim, Öğrenim ve Uygulama Önerileri). Bilgehan Basımevi, İzmir.
Mangan, J.L. (1988). Nutrition effects of tannins in animal feeds. Nutr. Res. Revievvs. 1: 209-231.
Menke, K.H.; Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., Fritz, D. & Schneider W. (1979). The estimation of the digestibility and metabolisable energy content of ruminant feding stuffs from the gas production when they are ıncubated with rumen liquor. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 93, 217-222.
Pazir, F. & Alper, Y. (2016). Carob fruit (Ceratonia siliqua L.) and health. Academic Food, 14, 333-338.
Ozkan, C.O.; Cengiz, T., Yanik, M., Evlice, S., Selcuk, B., Ceren, B. & Kamalak A. (2020). Determination of in vitro gas production, methane production, digestibility and microbial protein production of some forages and concentrates used in ruminant animal. BSJ Agri, 3, 56-60.
Sakalar, B. & Kamalak, A. (2016). Use of dried molasses beet pulp in ensiling of alfalfa plant. Anadolu J Agr Sci, 31, doi:10.7161/anajas.2016.31.1.157-164.
Uygur, A.M. (2007). Additives Used in Silage Production-2. Farmer's Brochure. https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/etae/Belgeler/EgitimBrosur/133-ciftcibro.pdf (accessed 27.07.2022)
Van Dyke, N.J. & Anderson, P.M. (2000). Interpreting a Forage Analysis. Alabama cooperative extension. Circular ANR-890.
Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A. (1991): Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74, 3583-3597.
Ward, R. & Ondarza, M.B. (2008). Relative fodder value (RFV) vs. relative forage quality (RFQ), Cumberland Valley Analytical Services, INC. Hagestown, MD, Paradox Nutrition, LLC, West Chazy, NY.
Woolfort, M.K. (1984). The silage ferment. Grassland Research Inst, Hurley, England, p. 350.
Zhu, Y.; Xiong, H., Wen, Z., Tian, H., Chen, Y., Wu, L., Guo, Y. & Sun, B. (2022). Effects of different concentrations of lactobacillus plantarum and bacillus licheniformis on silage quality, in vitro fermentation and microbial community of hybrid pennisetum. Animals, 12, 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ani12141752.
Zhang, T.; Ramakrishnon, R. & Livny, M. (1996). An efficient data clustering method for very large databases. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data, 103-114.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Euroasia Journal of Mathematics, Engineering, Natural & Medical Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.