Integrating Decision-Making Quality with Decision Support Systems: A Machine Learning Approach Based on Behavioural Insights from Business Professionals


DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15821904Keywords:
Decision-making quality, Decision support systems, Machine learning, Behavioural ınsightsAbstract
ABSTRACT
Decision-making quality is essential for organizational success and individual satisfaction. However, assessing and predicting decision quality has often stayed at a theoretical level and has not been integrated into practical tools like decision support systems (DSS). This study aims to close that gap by developing an approach based on machine learning that combines behavioural factors influencing decision-making with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques. Data were collected from business professionals across various industries, focusing on individual, environmental, and organizational factors that shape their decision satisfaction and regret. The dataset was balanced using synthetic sampling to ensure strong model performance. An XGBoost model predicted whether individuals would make the same decision again under current conditions. The model’s performance was validated with ROC curves, confusion matrices, and SHAP analysis to identify the key factors that influence the outcomes. The findings showed that variables such as perceived organizational fairness, external pressures, personal experience, and intuitive processes had a significant effect on decision quality. Including these behavioural insights into DSS frameworks can improve the accuracy and practical relevance of these systems. This study contributes to the link between behavioural science, machine learning, and decision support, providing new perspectives for managers and system developers.
References
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785-794.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425-445.
Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 17-37.
Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874.
Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1(2), 81-99.
Josephs, R. A., Larrick, R. P., Steele, C. M., & Nisbett, R. E. (1992). Protecting the self from the negative consequences of risky decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(1), 26-37.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
Loewenstein, G., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267-286.
Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.
March, J. G. (1994). A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. Free Press.
Molnar, C. (2019). Interpretable machine learning. Leanpub.
Nutt, P. C. (2008). Investigating the success of decision making processes. Journal of Management Studies, 45(2), 425-455.
Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. R. (2011). Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 553-572.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118.
Thaler, R. H. (2000). From Homo Economicus to Homo Sapiens. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 133-141.
Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2007). A theory of regret regulation 1.0. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), 3-18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Euroasia Journal of Mathematics, Engineering, Natural & Medical Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.